• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

非小细胞肺癌脑转治疗方法荟萃(更新于2011年11月9日)

    [复制链接]
1100548 492 老马 发表于 2011-10-15 20:30:11 |
老马  博士一年级 发表于 2013-7-16 23:43:36 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 浙江温州
Radiotherapy is often used palliatively in patients with metastatic lung cancer in the interest of achieving a better quality of life. But whether survival after palliative radiation justifies using the modality is debatable. Clinicians from Louisiana shed some light on the issue with a study that looked at prognostic factors in lung cancer with brain metastases. Would these patients be better off with hospice or supportive care?  

RESULT: Short survival after palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases in lung cancer: Does the end justify the means?
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine | Jun 9, 2013 (Free abstract. Full text $32)


Chemoradiotherapy has become a go-to in cancer treatment, but this pairing is not always successful. One group of researchers tested the regimen of stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiation, temozolomide(Drug information on temozolomide) (Temodar), and erlotinib (Tarceva) in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. They describe their trial results and explain why they were less than pleased with survival outcomes.

RESULT: A phase 3 trial of whole brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus WBRT and SRS with temozolomide or erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer and 1 to 3 brain metastases: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0320
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics (PubMed) | Apr 1, 2013 (Free abstract. Full text $30)


个人公众号:treeofhope
老马  博士一年级 发表于 2013-7-16 23:49:32 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 浙江温州
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391814
A phase 3 trial of whole brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus WBRT and SRS with temozolomide or erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer and 1 to 3 brain metastases: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0320.
Sperduto PW, Wang M, Robins HI, Schell MC, Werner-Wasik M, Komaki R, Souhami L, Buyyounouski MK, Khuntia D, Demas W, Shah SA, Nedzi LA, Perry G, Suh JH, Mehta MP.
SourceMetro MN CCOP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. psperduto@mropa.com

Abstract
BACKGROUND: A phase 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study subset analysis demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with the addition of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. Because temozolomide (TMZ) and erlotinib (ETN) cross the blood-brain barrier and have documented activity in NSCLC, a phase 3 study was designed to test whether these drugs would improve the OS associated with WBRT + SRS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: NSCLC patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases were randomized to receive WBRT (2.5 Gy × 15 to 37.5 Gy) and SRS alone, versus WBRT + SRS + TMZ (75 mg/m(2)/day × 21 days) or ETN (150 mg/day). ETN (150 mg/day) or TMZ (150-200 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days/month) could be continued for as long as 6 months after WBRT + SRS. The primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS: After 126 patients were enrolled, the study closed because of accrual limitations. The median survival times (MST) for WBRT + SRS, WBRT + SRS + TMZ, and WBRT + SRS + ETN were qualitatively different (13.4, 6.3, and 6.1 months, respectively), although the differences were not statistically significant. Time to central nervous system progression and performance status at 6 months were better in the WBRT + SRS arm. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was 11%, 41%, and 49% in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P<.001).

CONCLUSION: The addition of TMZ or ETN to WBRT + SRS in NSCLC patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases did not improve survival and possibly had a deleterious effect. Because the analysis is underpowered, these data suggest but do not prove that increased toxicity was the cause of inferior survival in the drug arms.

个人公众号:treeofhope
老马  博士一年级 发表于 2013-7-17 00:01:28 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 浙江温州
这项3期临床结果显示,脑部放疗联合特或者替莫无好处。
个人公众号:treeofhope
哀恸的人有福了  初中一年级 发表于 2013-7-18 17:24:33 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 山西
家人7月5日发现脑转,现在正在全脑放疗,口服特罗凯,看了老马上面的帖子,心里好纠结啊!
huanzi  大学二年级 发表于 2013-7-19 16:02:14 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国
脑转50天,正版特罗凯复查结果:比5月28号稍有减轻,癌胚原3,03降至2,83.说明特有效。继续服用特罗凯,请问老马老师,在脑转的情况下也需要轮换药吗?不是说只有特罗凯入脑吗?下步怎么走,盼指导。这月准备脉冲一下(2,1,0片)不知对否,看到帖子有这样试的,请关注脑转的病人,和家属,有经历的来说说,谢谢!
zyhwhq  初中三年级 发表于 2013-7-27 06:21:23 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 河北邯郸
父74,肺腺癌T2N0MO,12年2月左下肺切除,18外显因子突变,EGFR+++,VEGFR-2 +,HER2 -。13年7月脑出血,确诊为单发脑转。因从未做过放化疗,父亲状态尚好,偶尔头晕健忘。准备上印度易瑞沙。请教老马,是应该先全脑放还是先上靶向?
ritali  初中二年级 发表于 2013-8-11 22:57:23 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 广东河源

我们家都放过了,联合了特,联合替。效果未知。纠结的方案,现在不敢再用替了,感觉我们家每次用替都有不好的反应。
mgtaotao  初中一年级 发表于 2013-8-16 09:08:46 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 安徽
我们家EGFR基因没有突变,免疫组化VEGF HER  ALK也全部是阴性,2012年10月24日开始第一次化疗培美+奈达铂,一共化疗了6次+单药培美一次。于2013年4月22日结束化疗(这时医生发现培美耐药了),8月7日增强核磁发现脑转多发(目前脑转没有症状),现在医生建议脑部全放。请大家指点现在是不是脑部全放的最佳时候,全放后化疗用什么方案较好。恳请各位帮我出出主意。
夏花灿烂  初中二年级 发表于 2013-8-18 20:34:16 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 广西钦州
mgtaotao 发表于 2013-8-16 09:08
我们家EGFR基因没有突变,免疫组化VEGF HER  ALK也全部是阴性,2012年10月24日开始第一次化疗培美+奈达铂, ...

我家去年8月发现脑转,然后全脑放疗,之后上易,效果还不错。
明天会更好9999  大学一年级 发表于 2013-8-23 13:58:58 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 吉林吉林
有没有病友全脑放疗之后吃替莫唑胺的,请教效果,我家是脑转移,全脑放疗后2个月。
希望家人朋友健康快乐幸福!正版特罗凯赠药,QQ2315464847,微信:z18744280290

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表